Dagon: The Philistine Fish God

Share/recommend this article:

Excerpt In the book of Judges, we read how the Israelites served “Baal and Ashtaroth”, pagan gods of the various nations (Judges 2:11-13), but Dagon, the god of the Philistines, is mentioned by name and often depicted as a “fish-god”. How is Dagon different than the other idols? Continue reading

Related Articles
Like this artice?

Our Ministry relies on the generosity of people like you. Every small donation helps us develop and publish great articles.

Please support ABR!

Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & PayPal

Question: In the book of Judges, we read how the Israelites served “Baal and Ashtaroth”, pagan gods of the various nations (Judges 2:11-13), but Dagon, the god of the Philistines, is mentioned by name and often depicted as a “fish-god”.  How is Dagon different than the other idols?

Answer: Dagon was originally a Semitic deity, adopted by the Philistines after they invaded Canaan, ca. 1177 BC.  We have records of Dagon dating to the 3rd dynasty of Ur in the 25th Century BC.  Dagon was very popular among the Amorites, among whom “Dagon” is a component of many personal names, and Assyrians.

Most scholars argue that he was originally a vegetation, grain and wheat, deity. The name is very similar to the Hebrew word for “grain”, dāgān. This would create an interesting irony in the Samson narratives, as Samson was forced to grind wheat for the Philistines (Judges 16).  However, some descriptions seem to make Dagon a storm-god, possibly in connection with the need of rain for the wheat and grain harvest.

However, Dagon in iconography Dagon is often presented as fish-god.  This depiction has survived the centuries and is quite controversial.  The reason it has survived is the similarity of the name to the Hebrew term dâg, meaning “fish”.  This connection was first popularized by Rashi, Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki (AD 1040-1105), author of an extensive commentary on the Tanakh.  He imagined, based on this connection to the Hebrew term dâg, that Dagon was in the shape of a fish.

David Kimhi (AD 1160-1235), Medieval Rabbi and Bible Commentator, expanded upon the interpretation of Rashi.  In his comments on 1 Samuel 5, wherein the Philistines placed the Ark with Dagon, he interpreted the statement “only the flat part was left to him” (1 Samuel 5:4) as meaning “only the form of a fish was left”.  He reasoned that since the text mentions “hands”, Dagon was in the in the form of a fish from the waist down, hence the name, and in the form of a man from the waist up.  One must note that the LXX mentions both hand and feet.

In 1928, H. Schmökel argued that Dagon was never a “fish-god”, half-man and half-fish.  However, once his cult became important to the sea-faring and maritime peoples, such as the Phoenicians and Philistines, the false connection to dâg (fish) had a powerful impact on Dagon’s iconography.  Some scholars still insist that this merman image, half-man and half-fish, is a secondary aspect to this god of the Philistines.  The Philistines were a powerful part of the invasion of the “Sea Peoples” who swept the Eastern end of the Mediterranean basin ca. 1200 BC.  Therefore, a god with aquatic aspects could prove to be an important part of their pantheon.

Overall, Dagon is represented somewhat differently than other gods in Judges.  This is because he is linked to the Philistines, who seemed to have adopted Dagon very early, one of the most hated enemies of YHWH and Israel.  The Philistines represented a more menacing type of threat than the local Canaanites who had inhabited the Promised Land.  With their political and military organization the Philistines were a viable threat to wipe out Israel and thwart complete possession of the land.  Their importance is fully seen in that, according to 2 Samuel 5, their defeat was a key to the establishment of Davidic power.  The tensions between Israel and Philistia began with Samson, encompassed the careers of Samuel and Saul, and ended with David.  Therefore, based on Dagon’s long Semitic history and his connection with the Philistines, it is quite understandable that Dagon should be remembered in such detail by the biblical authors.

Comments Comment RSS

8/29/2009 3:13 AM #

Hello ABR!
You know, I'm doing a study about The dead see srolls. But some peoples are saying, that the  dead sea scrolls don't support the Bible but repudiate it. For example Barbara Thiering,  Eisenman, Allegro, etc. I was alreday read one of your text in the Christiananswers.net. But according to this three guys specially Barbara T. whotrustworthy those srolls are?

For your answer I'll be very thankful

God bless you


Dave Tripplat - 8/29/2009 3:13:01 AM

Research RSS Feed

AddThis Feed Button

Recent Articles

In this article we will discuss why the decree of Daniel 9:25 must be identified with one issued by the...
II. Analysis and Discussion 3. Liber Biblicarum Antiquitatum 4. Augustine’s Renegade Scribe Theory 5....
II. Analysis and Discussion 2. Straw Men and Ad Hominems
II. Analysis and Discussion 1. The Rabbinic Deflation of the MT’s Primeval Chronology
Associates for Biblical Research
  • PO Box 144, Akron, PA 17501
  • Phone: +1 717-859-3443
  • Toll Free: 1-800-430-0008
Friend ABR on Facebook.com Join us on Twitter Join us on Twitter